Skip to main content
Back to Insights
MYTH-BUSTERAS/NZS 3008 Table 3 · AS/NZS 3000 Cl.3.9.2 · BS 7671 Reg.521.5 · NEC 110.14 · IEC 60364-5-52 Annex B

MYTH: Aluminium Cable Is Always Cheaper Than Copper

Everyone says aluminium saves money. But below 95mm², the larger conduit, bigger terminations, and anti-oxidant compound often make copper cheaper overall.

December 2, 2025

The Aluminium "Savings" That Cost You More

The myth: "Aluminium cable is cheaper than copper — always use it for large feeders."

The reality: Aluminium has a crossover point below which copper is cheaper installed, not just purchased.

The Conductivity Gap

Aluminium conductivity = 61% of copper (IEC 60364-5-52 Annex B)

To match copper current rating, aluminium needs:

  • ~1.6× the cross-sectional area
  • Larger conduit/cable tray
  • Bigger glands, lugs, and terminations
  • Anti-oxidant compound (prevents oxidation)
  • More labor (heavier, stiffer cable)

Cost Breakdown: 50m Run, 3-Phase, 100A

Component35mm² Cu50mm² AlΔ Cost
Cable ($/m)$18$12-$300
Conduit 32mm vs 40mm ($/m)$8$11+$150
Glands/lugs (4 ends)$45$65+$80
Anti-oxidant paste$0$35+$35
Labor (install + terminate)$850$1,100+$250
Total installed$2,145$2,350+$205

Aluminium "savings": -$300 conductor cost, +$515 ancillary costs = $215 more expensive installed.

The Crossover Point

Aluminium becomes cost-effective when:

  1. Cable run >150m (conductor cost dominates)
  2. Cable size ≥120mm² (conduit/gland premium flattens)
  3. Open cable tray (no conduit cost penalty)
  4. Low-congestion installation (easier handling of stiffer cable)

For short runs (<100m) and small cables (<95mm²), copper wins on total installed cost.

The Hidden Risks

Aluminium terminations require:

  • Torque wrench (specific N·m per lug size) — over-tightening causes cold flow
  • Inspection schedule (re-torque after 6 months, then annually per AS/NZS 3000)
  • Oxide inhibitor (prevents high-resistance joints)
  • Bimetallic lugs (if connecting to copper busbars)

Copper: tighten to finger-tight + 1/4 turn. Done.

Standards Perspective

AS/NZS 3008 Table 3: Lists both copper and aluminium current ratings. Aluminium needs 1.5-1.8× area for equivalent rating.

BS 7671 Regulation 521.5: Requires suitable terminations and protection against galvanic corrosion for aluminium.

NEC 110.14: Requires terminals and lugs to be identified for aluminium use — many aren't.

Real Project: 200-Circuit Commercial Fitout

Scenario: Replace 200 × 4mm² Cu subcircuit cables with aluminium to "save money."

Reality:

  • Need 200 × 6mm² Al (nearest equivalent rating)
  • Conduit upsizes from 25mm to 32mm on 60% of runs
  • Switchboard lugs: standard copper to bespoke aluminium-rated
  • Termination labor: +15 minutes per circuit (anti-ox, torque wrench)
  • Re-inspection after 6 months (contractual obligation per AS/NZS 3000)

Result: $27,000 "savings" on cable became $42,000 extra cost installed + ongoing inspection liability.

Try It Yourself

Use ECalPro cable sizing calculator:

  1. Size a 50m run at 80A, 3-phase, 0.85 pf
  2. Note the copper size and cost
  3. Switch to aluminium
  4. Add conduit, gland, labor premiums
  5. Compare total installed cost

Takeaway: Aluminium saves money on large, long feeders. For subcircuits and short runs, copper is often cheaper installed. Always calculate total cost, not just $/m cable.

Try It Yourself

Run the calculations from this article using our free calculators:

Standards Referenced

AS/NZS 3008 Table 3AS/NZS 3000 Cl.3.9.2BS 7671 Reg.521.5NEC 110.14IEC 60364-5-52 Annex B