Skip to main content

The Difference Between 'Earth Fault Loop Impedance' and 'Ground Resistance' — They're Not the Same

Earth fault loop impedance (Zs) and ground/earth resistance (R_E) are frequently confused, but they measure entirely different things. Zs is the full fault circuit path that determines protection clearing time. R_E is the electrode-to-earth resistance that determines touch voltage. Mixing them up is dangerous.

2 min readUpdated March 12, 2026
Share:

Two Measurements, Two Purposes

These two values are routinely conflated in site reports, and the confusion can kill. They measure fundamentally different things:

ParameterEarth Fault Loop Impedance (Zs)Earth/Ground Resistance (RE)
What it measuresFull circuit: source → line conductor → fault → PE conductor → back to sourceElectrode to general mass of earth only
UnitOhms (Ω)Ohms (Ω)
PurposeDetermines if protection device operates fast enough under faultDetermines touch voltage in TT/IT systems
Standard referenceBS 7671, Regulation 411.4.4BS 7671, Regulation 411.5.3
Typical value0.2–2.0 Ω (TN systems)2–200 Ω (depends on soil)
Test instrumentLoop impedance testerFall-of-potential earth tester

Why Confusing Them Is Dangerous

In a TN system, the earth fault return path is through the metallic PE conductor back to the transformer neutral. Zs is low (typically under 1 Ω), fault current is high, and the MCB or fuse operates in its fast region. RE is largely irrelevant to protection operation — the fault current does not flow through the earth electrode.

In a TT system, the fault return path goes through the installation’s earth electrode, through the general mass of earth, and back via the supply authority’s earth electrode. Zs is dominated by RE, which may be 20–200 Ω. Fault current is low (often 1–10A), and overcurrent devices will not operate fast enough — which is why BS 7671, Regulation 411.5.2 requires an RCD for TT systems.

The dangerous confusion: an engineer measures RE = 8 Ω at a TT installation and concludes “the earthing is fine.” But 8 Ω means the fault current is only 230/8 = 29A. A 32A MCB will not trip on 29A — certainly not within the 0.4s required by Regulation 411.3.2.2. The installation needs an RCD, regardless of how good the earth electrode is.

Field note: I have reviewed TT installations in rural Indonesia where the earth electrode measured 4 Ω — excellent by any standard — but no RCD was installed because the contractor believed “the earth is good enough.” At 4 Ω, fault current is 57A. A 63A MCB will not trip. An RCD at 30mA will trip in under 30ms. Different measurement, different protection, different outcome.

Know Which One You Need

Before you test, know what you are testing for:

  • Verifying overcurrent protection operates fast enough? → Measure Zs (loop impedance).
  • Verifying touch voltage is within limits? → Measure RE (earth resistance).
  • Verifying RCD protection in TT systems? → You need both: RE to confirm touch voltage, and RCD test to confirm trip time.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, and it should be. On a TT system, Zs will be much higher than on a TN system because it includes both earth electrode resistances (installation and supply). This high Zs value confirms that overcurrent devices alone cannot provide fault protection — reinforcing the requirement for RCD protection per BS 7671 Regulation 411.5.2.
It depends on the application. For a TT system with 30mA RCD protection, BS 7671 requires R_E × I_delta_n ≤ 50V, so R_E must be below 1667Ω — easily achieved. For a lightning protection system per BS EN 62305, the target is typically 10Ω or less. For a high-voltage substation, AS/NZS 3000 and IEEE 80 may require under 1Ω. The 'good' value is always determined by the protection requirement, not by an arbitrary number.

Related Resources