Skip to main content

IEC TC64 Working Group Update: What's Coming in IEC 60364-5-52 Revision

IEC TC64 WG3 is revising IEC 60364-5-52, the international cable sizing standard. Expect simplified reference method coding, updated grouping factors reflecting real-world load diversity, new cable type inclusions, and alignment with the IEC 60287 thermal calculation series.

IEC 603643 min readUpdated March 12, 2026
Share:

What IEC TC64 WG3 Is Revising

Summary: IEC 60364-5-52 — the foundational international standard for cable selection and installation — is undergoing its most significant revision since the 2009 edition. IEC TC64 Working Group 3 is addressing four major areas: simplified reference method coding, updated grouping factor methodology, new cable type inclusions, and alignment with the IEC 60287 thermal calculation series. Publication is expected 2027–2028.

If you work on multinational projects — or use any national standard derived from IEC 60364 — these changes will cascade through your cable sizing methodology. Here is what the working documents indicate.

Simplified reference method coding

The current reference method system (A1, A2, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, G) is functional but has accumulated ambiguity over successive editions. WG3 is proposing:

  • A hierarchical coding system: primary method (enclosed, open, buried) with sub-codes for specific configurations
  • Explicit mapping between IEC reference methods and national equivalents — a direct response to the confusion engineers face when converting between IEC, BS, and AS/NZS method designations
  • New reference methods for installations not well covered by the current system: cables on building facades, cables in ceiling voids with thermal insulation contact on one side, and cables in modular construction assemblies

The intent is that an engineer specifying “IEC Method E” in a project in Singapore and another specifying the same in a project in Brazil will unambiguously mean the same physical installation.

Grouping Factors and New Cable Types

Updated grouping factor methodology

The current grouping factors in IEC 60364-5-52, Table B.52.17 to B.52.21 assume all grouped circuits are simultaneously loaded at rated current. This is conservative to the point of being unrealistic for many installations. WG3 is developing:

  • A tiered approach: default grouping factors (conservative, no load data required) alongside a diversity-adjusted grouping method where documented load profiles justify reduced derating
  • Specific grouping provisions for circuits with known low duty cycles (intermittent motor circuits, lighting circuits with scheduled dimming, EV chargers with load management)
  • Thermal modelling guidance for complex multi-circuit arrangements where tabulated grouping factors do not adequately describe the installation — bridging to the IEC 60287 series for engineered solutions

This is significant. A diversity-adjusted grouping method could reduce cable sizes by 15–30% in installations where load diversity is genuine and documented — data centres, multi-storey residential, industrial facilities with shift-dependent loading.

New cable type inclusions

The current edition’s current-carrying capacity tables are based on PVC and XLPE insulation with copper or aluminium conductors. The revision adds:

  • LSZH (Low Smoke Zero Halogen) cables — now the default specification in tunnels, public buildings, and transport infrastructure, but with thermal ratings that differ from standard PVC
  • Fire-rated cables (BS 8519, IEC 60331 compliant) with sustained current ratings during fire conditions — essential for emergency circuit design
  • DC power cables with specific current ratings that account for the absence of skin effect and proximity effect, relevant for solar PV strings, battery systems, and DC distribution architectures

IEC 60287 Alignment and What It Means for Practice

The current disconnect between IEC 60364-5-52 (prescriptive tables) and IEC 60287 (thermal calculation methods) forces engineers to choose between two systems that should be complementary. The revision aims to bridge this gap:

  • Tabulated ratings in IEC 60364-5-52 will be explicitly derived from IEC 60287 thermal models, with the assumed parameters published alongside each table
  • Where an installation deviates from the tabulated assumptions (non-standard ambient, unusual soil thermal resistivity, mixed cable types in a group), the standard will provide a clear pathway to IEC 60287 for a calculated rating rather than requiring engineers to interpolate between tables
  • Software validation criteria — for the first time, the standard will include benchmark calculations that cable sizing software should reproduce, enabling engineers to verify that their tools (including ECalPro) implement the methodology correctly

Expected publication timeline: Committee Draft (CD) circulated Q4 2026, Committee Draft for Vote (CDV) mid-2027, publication late 2027 or early 2028. National adoptions (including BS, AS/NZS, and EN versions) typically follow 6–18 months after IEC publication.

For engineers working on multi-standard projects today, the implication is clear: the standards are converging. Invest time in understanding the IEC framework now, because your national standard will adopt these changes within two years of publication.

Standards referenced: IEC 60364-5-52:2009+A1:2011 (current edition), IEC 60287-1-1:2023, IEC 60331, BS 8519:2010.

Try the Cable Sizing Calculator

Put this methodology into practice. Calculate results with full standard clause references — free, no sign-up required.

Or embed this calculator on your site
Calculate Cable Sizing

Frequently Asked Questions

For standard installations using conventional cable types and reference methods, the tabulated current ratings are expected to remain substantially similar. The significant changes affect non-standard installations: grouped circuits with known diversity, LSZH and fire-rated cables, DC circuits, and installations where the tabulated assumptions do not match the actual conditions. These are the scenarios where engineers currently struggle most with the existing standard.
The proposed method requires documented load profiles for the grouped circuits. Where an engineer can demonstrate that not all circuits are simultaneously loaded at rated current — through measured data, equipment specifications, or load management systems — a reduced grouping derating can be applied. The default conservative factors remain available for installations without load documentation. Expect a methodology similar to what AS/NZS 3008.1.1 already permits through its maximum demand provisions.

Related Resources